Haml undefined 'buffer' bug back again
Reported by Nick Dufresne | March 7th, 2008 @ 07:00 PM
I get the undefined 'buffer' bug again because of a recent addition to template.rb that redefines the haml_buffer helper with a binding and breaks the concat_haml method. attached is a patch that should revert the changes back to what they were.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Michael D. Ivey (ivey) March 10th, 2008 @ 12:07 AM
- → Assigned user changed from “” to “Daniel Neighman (hassox)”
- → State changed from “new” to “open”
I reverted the commit in question. hassox, can you take a look and see what's the correct way to go here?
-
Daniel Neighman (hassox) March 10th, 2008 @ 12:55 AM
- → State changed from “open” to “resolved”
This was my mistake completely. A new version of Haml, and a rolled back merb-haml locally and it was sorted.
Many Appologies.
-
Daniel Neighman (hassox) March 10th, 2008 @ 01:39 AM
- → Assigned user changed from “Daniel Neighman (hassox)” to “Yehuda Katz (wycats)”
- → State changed from “resolved” to “open”
This is still an issue. It raises it's head when using form_for.
-
Nick Dufresne March 10th, 2008 @ 02:43 PM
I don't get the problem with the latest git pull for merb-more and haml. I use form_for with haml without any undefined buffer issues.
-
Daniel Neighman (hassox) March 10th, 2008 @ 10:08 PM
Thanx wycats for following this up for me.
For info I've been using hcatlins github for haml :O
This is out of date, and I should have been using nex3's.
I stand by my earlier statement that this is completely my fault.
-
Daniel Neighman (hassox) March 10th, 2008 @ 10:14 PM
- → State changed from “open” to “resolved”
Please Login or create a free account to add a new comment.
You can update this ticket by sending an email to from your email client. (help)
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
Yehuda Katz (wycats)
Marcus Ahnve